Posted on

A Woman Married A Bridge

Jodi Rose married the Devil’s Bridge in France.

People who define marriage as existing between one man and one woman receive criticisms like:

  • “You’re a bigot.”
  • “You’re hateful, unloving, intolerant.”
  • “What business is it of yours?”
  • And probably the most common: “If two people love each other why can’t they…”

What would people making these criticisms say if…

  • Two close relatives wanted to marry?
  • An adult wanted to marry a young child?
  • Multiple people wanted to be married to each other?
  • Someone wanted to marry an animal, an inanimate object, or herself?

Typical responses would probably be…

  • “That’s ridiculous!”
  • “It’ll never get that far!”
  • “You’re just being inflammatory!”
  • “Quit being stupid.”

Apparently it’s not that ridiculous, far-fetched, inflammatory or stupid:

Nadine Schweigert married herself. She “exchanged rings with her inner groom” saying, “I feel very empowered, very happy, very joyous…I want to share that with people, and also the people in attendance, it’s a form of accountability.” Accountable to, or for, what? She’s going to have trouble staying faithful to herself? How could that be a problem?

Jodi Rose married the Devil’s Bridge and no, I’m not trying to make this sound satanic by giving the bridge that name. On her blog Jodi wrote, “The Devil’s Bridge is everything I could desire in a husband – sturdy, trustworthy, sensual, kind and handsome.”

Someone might say, “You can’t act like something’s a big deal just because ONE PERSON does it!” Okay…

Now there is a problem for some of these people: their countries don’t recognize their marriages. I know it’s hateful, bigoted, intolerant, unloving, and cruel, but it’s true. This leaves them two choices…

They can follow Sal’s example and go to Guam where he was able to have his marriage to Nene recognized. In Guam the people are tolerant, open-minded, kind, and loving. What kind of country would Guam be if it didn’t define marriage as the union between a human and an electronic device?

They can get enough people together to picket, have parades, scream about equal rights, kiss their dogs, pillows, walls, snakes, dolphins and video games until everyone’s convinced marriage should be whatever they want it to be…because if enough people think something is right, it must be right! These people love each other and who are we to say two (or three) people who love each other…er…I mean love animals…er, I mean love pillows…er, I mean love video games…er, I mean love walls…shouldn’t be able to marry.

Related Posts

8 thoughts on “A Woman Married A Bridge

  1. Reblogged this on Pastor Scott LaPierre and commented:

    I wanted to reblog this in response to the Supreme Court’s decision to redefine marriage…

  2. And this is only the start! We will be challenged these days to KNOW how we should be living! Are you up for the task? 😉

    1. Hmm…I know…it’s unpleasant to think of what could be ahead Lori.

    2. What’s really unloving is to allow them to continue in their perversion without doing what we can to lead them to the TRUTH.

      Lynn Arthur

  3. Praise God he has showed us what is right and wrong! The world will always want to decide for itself what is right, but as God’s children we know for sure what is, according to his Word. The people described in this blog clearly have some mental illness, this kind of behavior simply isn’t normal, even in the evil world we live in.

    1. You’re right Brother! Examples of what life can look like apart from the Lord!

  4. A bridge can’t enter into a contract, neither can an animal! Polygamist can and will push for equal rights now however! No, why not? You’ve heard of “it takes a village”?

Do you have a question or thought? If so, please share!